| * A RESOLUTION stating Council's support for improving the
City's athletic field system to increase playing capacity, clarifying the
conditions under which Council extends its support, and directing the
Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation to prioritize the order that
athletic fields will be improved and to collect additional information that
will more clearly link the proposed improvements with demand for particular
sports.
Information updated as of July 23, 2003 3:02 PM
Date introduced/referred: Sep 23, 2002
Date adopted: Oct 7, 2002
Status: Adopted As Amended
Vote: 9-0
Committee: Parks, Education and Libraries
Sponsor: STEINBRUECK
Index Terms: STATING-POLICY, PARKS, ATHLETIC-FIELDS,
PLAYGROUNDS-AND-PLAYFIELDS
WHEREAS, while the City Council supports the development of athletic
fields, potential impacts on neighborhoods need to be considered and
mitigated where necessary; and
WHEREAS, the Council believes field improvements should be distributed
throughout the City to the extent possible; and
WHEREAS, the majority of the City's athletic fields are within
residential zones and increasing the number of hours of play at athletic
fields could negatively impact neighborhoods by generating an increase in
traffic, noise, lighting, and parking if not adequately mitigated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that Seattle's user fees for athletic
fields should not be significantly less than King County's user fees to
avoid creating outside demand for City fields; and
WHEREAS, the City Council encourages Parks to establish user fees that
more closely recover the costs of maintaining and operating athletic fields
and that reflect the various costs of different field types and lights; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEATTLE, THE MAYOR CONCURRING, THAT:
Identify sites where impacts from improvements have fewer negative
impacts to adjacent residences relative to other sites and install
improvements at these sites first. Improvements at these sites should then
be installed in the following order:
Parks should distribute field improvements throughout the City to the
extent possible and install improvements in areas of the City that lack
adequate field capacity relative to other areas.
To determine the appropriate level of investment and track increases in
trends, Parks shall track the following information and, beginning with the
2005-06 budget biennium, provide a report during each budget biennium to
Council that links proposed field improvements to unmet demand trends:
- Number of hours/games scheduled each season broken down by sport,
league, and age group
- Number of games that organizations play outside the City
- Annual hours scheduled on Seattle School District Property for non-
school sports
- Number and type of fields available each season for each sport
- Number of in-city and out-of-city players for each organized league
- When (time of day, weekend vs. weekday, and month) and how often an
organization/team/league is denied a request to schedule a game or
practice due to lack of field availability within the City of Seattle
(denials for particular fields are of less concern than denials for any
field availability throughout the City).
During the 1st quarter of 2003, Parks shall submit a report showing how
scheduling practices would be impacted if Department sponsored sports groups
are not given scheduling priority over non-Department sponsored sports
groups, distinguishing between youth and adult groups. Parks shall also
identify the percentage of Department sponsored sport groups that are
neighborhood based, i.e., membership is geographically based vs. based on
some other affiliation.
Parks should continue its current policy of setting different fee levels
for youth and adult users and for lighted vs. non-lighted fields. Parks
should also consider the costs associated with different field types when
setting user fees.
Public Involvement Process for Site Specific Planning Decisions
Specific improvements that increase the playing capacity of athletic fields
shall be based on a thorough public involvement process. Parks must also
demonstrate it has conducted public workshops for residents within
one-eighth (1/8) of a mile of the affected field to solicit comments and
suggestions on design and potential impacts in a manner that provides
residents a full and fair opportunity to be heard. During the public
workshops, Parks will describe the proposed improvements, the increase in
hours of use and traffic that are anticipated and various options to
mitigate any adverse impacts identified to the extent practicable.
|